paserbyp: (Default)
Pornhub is now blocked in Alabama amid a battle over the states' age-verification laws. It joins Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Utah, where the adult site is also blocked—unless you try to get around it with a VPN. It's also poised to happen in Florida, where an age-verification law goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2025.

In Alabama, access to Pornhub was blocked ahead of an age-verification law that goes into effect on Oct. 1. Under HB164, adult sites must use "reasonable age verification methods" to confirm that people are over the age of 18 and display warnings about porn being "potentially biologically addictive" and harmful to "human brain development".

In Indiana, SB17 went into effect on June 27, and requires sites that offer adult content to "use a reasonable age verification method to prevent a minor from accessing an adult-oriented website." Detractors argue that it could have a chilling effect on free speech since people may fear having their identities exposed should a site like Pornhub ever be breached. The California-based Free Speech Coalition and a group of adult platforms, including Pornhub parent company Aylo, have sued, arguing that "laws like SB17 have effectively functioned as state censorship."

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, however, says "children shouldn't be able to easily access explicit material that can cause them harm. It's commonsense. We need to protect and shield them from the psychological and emotional consequences associated with viewing porn. We look forward to upholding our constitutional duty to defend this law in court."

In Kentucky, House Bill 278 is similar and applies to sites where more than one-third of its content would be considered harmful to minors.

At issue in Texas is HB 1181, which requires adult sites to verify that visitors are of age. It was set to go into effect in September 2023, but Pornhub sued and secured an early victory. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed and got a temporary reprieve in March, allowing the state to enforce HB 1181. Pornhub responded by blocking access to its site in the state a few months ago.

As noted by CBS Austin political reporter Michael Adkison, those who visit Pornhub in Texas are now met with a message that argues the Texas law is "ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous."

"We believe that the only effective solution for protecting minors and adults alike is to verify users' age on their device and to either deny or allow access to age-restricted materials and websites based on that verification," the message adds.

Pornhub further argues that this type of legislation will only drive people to less scrupulous sites, which "put minors and your privacy at risk."

"This is not the end. We are reviewing options and consulting with our legal team," Alex Kekesi, VP of Brand and Community at Aylo, said following the Texas ban. (These bans affect all sites run by Aylo, formerly MindGeek—which includes YouPorn, RedTube, Brazzers, and more.)

This battle kicked off almost a year ago when Pornhub blocked access in Utah over a similar age-verification law. As more states adopted these laws, Pornhub blockades followed. By early 2024, it was also blocked in North Carolina, Montana, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Virginia.

In North Carolina, House Bill 8 is a larger education bill that also covers things like adding a computer science requirement for high school graduation. But it also imposes the age-verification check for adult sites. In signing the bill in late September, Gov. Roy Cooper said those age checks are "important...to help protect children from online pornography."

HB8 requires sites to use "a commercially available database that is regularly used by businesses or governmental entities for the purpose of age and identity verification or...another commercially reasonable method." Sites that fail to comply could face a civil action from the parents of kids who viewed pornography or anyone whose data is unlawfully retained.

n Montana, SB 544 requires sites to verify age by having people provide "a digitized identification card" or access a "commercial age verification system" that checks a government ID or uses some other sort of "commercially reasonable method" to verify someone's age.

In both states, sites are covered by the laws if at least 33.3% of its content is adult in nature.

If you're affected by the ban, use the VPN app of your choice to connect to a server not in a location currently blocked by Pornhub. (Note that while this guidance can be used to get around Pornhub's embargo, it could also be used to avoid the very age-restriction requirements Pornhub is protesting. I can't advise you on the risks of trying to circumvent the law.)

When you switch on a VPN, your web traffic is routed through an encrypted connection to a server operated by the VPN company. That server could be in a different state or a different country from you. Because your web traffic exits that server, it appears as if you are browsing the web from wherever the server is.

So, if you're in Utah, you should connect to a VPN server that's not located in Utah, and then navigate to Pornhub as usual. I recommend that you also use incognito mode while streaming pornography to prevent the URLs from showing up in your browser's history and autocomplete options.

Nearly all VPN services will let you specify the country where you want your traffic to appear. Some will let you pick down to the city level. A few let you see a list of the actual servers themselves, and their locations, and make your choice that way.

US-based Pornhub viewers will probably want to use a VPN server that's located in the US. I recommend a VPN that will at least let you choose servers in a specific US state. Do note that latency will increase and browsing speed decrease when using a VPN, and that the impact will be more noticeable the further away the VPN server is from you.

For example, Proton VPN, shows the cities and specific servers available to customers. It also offers an excellent free VPN, but your server choice will be far more limited—there are servers in the US, but you can't specify which to use. Fortunately, the free version has no time or data limit.

Other VPNs that let you select cities include IVPN, Mullvad VPN, NordVPN, Surfshark VPN, and TunnelBear VPN. Note that IVPN and Mullvad VPN use a privacy-protecting account number system that requires very little personal information, and both will accept cash sent to their respective HQs for a nearly anonymous experience.

Scandal

Jun. 2nd, 2024 10:05 am
paserbyp: (Default)
The town of Agde on the Mediterranean coast may be known for its beautiful sandy beaches and year-round sun, but it’s also got a reputation for wild sex parties.
The town is home to Europe’s biggest swinger community. Tens of thousands of couples head to the town from across Europe every year to swap partners.

But right now, the town is reeling from an entirely new scandal which has the rest of France shaking its head in collective bemusement and amusement.

It concerns a local fortune teller and the town’s mayor, Gilles d’Ettore, a former secret service officer and police officer.

Both are now in jail while under judicial investigation. The fortune teller, Sophia Martinez, faces charges of embezzlement, while the mayor is accused of corruption for spending lavish amounts of taxpayers’ money on her.

Ms Martinez had a reputation for being able to speak to the dead. According to Mr d'Ettore's lawyer, when the mayor asked her to put him in touch with his deceased father, she succeeded. While performing séances, her voice would suddenly appear to change and take on the tone of the mayor’s father.

Over the past four years it is alleged that she manipulated the mayor in person and by phone with remarkable ventriloquist skills.

He received thousands of mysterious calls from “voices” of the dead including angels, some of them urging the mayor to help the fortune teller.

And that’s where the corruption comes in.

The mayor is alleged to have paid for lavish holidays for Ms Martinez and her family, including to Polynesia and Thailand, all using public funds. It’s alleged that the “voices” persuaded him to hire several members of her family to work for the town council and also renovate her home. Local businesses with connections to the mayor did the work for free out of fear of losing future contracts with him.

With all of the attention, the mayor’s lawyer Jean Marc Darrigade has been turned into a minor celebrity overnight.

“It’s a crazy story,” he tells me at his office in nearby Montpellier. “It’s incredible because you have a man in politics, mayor and former MP who is very intelligent. And you discover that a man like that can be manipulated by a woman.


“This is a woman who came into his life and said I can speak to your deceased father. She found a mental weakness in him and exploited it for personal gain. It took a long time before he accepted he had been conned,” Mr Darrigade adds.

But Ms Martinez's lawyer, Luc Abratkiewicz, has a different view.

“She has admitted betraying the mayor’s confidence but it’s not a case of manipulation because she has owned up to what she did and other clients including doctors and architects said she had mystical powers,” he says.

“She revealed details about their lives that no-one else knew about.”

The lawyers deny it but locals said it all comes down to sex in a town with a lot of it already.

At a sun-splashed café near the town hall, one customer Jean-Max said: “I like the mayor, he has been good to me, he was tricked. Maybe he was in love with her.”

Another local added, chuckling: “For me, sex is at the heart of the scandal. Where there is money involved, then it means sex is part of it too."

"They kind of go together."

The far-right has made significant gains in this part of France in recent years. One of the mayor’s most vocal critics is Fabienne Varesano, a fast-rising local politician from Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National party. She has called on the mayor to resign.

“He can be generous, in love with lots of different women, that’s his personal life. But using taxpayers’ money, that is a different story,” she says.

“He has made a mockery out of our town."

A judge is keeping both the mayor and fortune teller in custody to prevent potential witness tampering. Ms Martinez has been moved to solitary confinement after being assaulted at her women’s only prison wing with inmates accusing her of witchcraft.

Sex Strike

Mar. 16th, 2024 12:18 pm
paserbyp: (Default)
In Aristophanes’s play “Lysistrata”, a young Athenian woman persuades the women of warring Greek states to deny their lovers sex in protest at an ongoing war. Together they vow not to raise their “slippers to the roof” or crouch down before a man “like a lioness on all fours”. Soon bitter conflict erupts between the sexes and an angry chorus of men declares that there is no wild beast harder to tame than the woman.

More than two millennia later women in Kiryas Joel, an ultra-Orthodox Jewish enclave an hour outside New York City, are carrying out a similar strike. According to their leader, Adina Sash, 800 women refused to sleep with their husbands last Friday night, a time when intimacy is considered especially holy. More have since joined the cause. Unlike the Greeks they are not protesting against war but rather a religious system in which men can shackle women to unwanted marriages.

Under Jewish law a divorce is not finalised until a man gives a woman a get, a 12-line letter written in Aramaic that declares her no longer bound to him. Three rabbis must sign off on it. That has led to a global scandal where abusive men leverage gets for money and custody of children or withhold them to force chastity and singlehood on past partners.

In Kiryas Joel, an insular place where a woman must ask permission from her rabbi to report domestic violence to the cops, 29-year-old Malky Berkowitz has begged for a get for four years. Her husband Volvy has refused despite petitions from religious authorities. She is just one of many. “Malky is the face of every woman who has fought and gone through the system like a docile, demure, obedient sheep,” says Ms Sash. Estimates of the number of “chained” women around the world, known as agunot, range from hundreds to thousands.

Their advocates have tried to get secular courts to recognise get-refusal as abuse. In Britain a 2021 amendment to the legal code deemed the practice criminally “coercive”; one year later the first man was jailed for it for 18 months. But in America change is coming more slowly.

Criminal-justice reformers, who police over-policing, have pushed back on victims’-rights groups that want to increase penalties and make egregious cases felonies. Meanwhile recalcitrant men are working the legal system to their advantage: according to the Organisation for the Resolution of Agunot, a non-profit group, there has been a sharp rise in the number filing nuisance lawsuits claiming that women demanding gets are harassing or defaming them.

The intractability of it all made the American wives finally go for the nuclear option. Those who keep illicit smartphones tucked away in underwear drawers—internet is largely forbidden among the ultra-Orthodox—passed along the plan. The idea was simple: withhold sex to get your man to care enough to press other men to act. In a community where women are expected to shave and cover their heads for modesty and to marry near-strangers as teenagers, some are saying no to sex for the first time since they can remember.

Many women however, including Ms Berkowitz, don’t quite know what to make of the protest. Louder voices are against it. Herschel Schacter, a prominent rabbi who runs the rabbinical school at Yeshiva University, declared the strike to be a violation of Jewish law and warned it could wreck marriages. Some young Orthodox men are calling Ms Sash a shiksa, a derogatory Yiddish term for a gentile woman.

In the story of Aristophanes’s “Lysistrata” the carnal deprivation quickly becomes too much for the Greek men to bear. The play concludes with a lustful bunch of blokes brokering a truce between Athens and Sparta, just as the women demanded. Ms Sash hopes for her own sort of peace deal—that Ms Berkowitz be freed before the Sabbath sets in at dusk on Friday.

Asked if she plans to use this tactic in the future, she says she does not intend to incite more “feminist terror”. The point is instead to teach the next generation of religious girls that if conventional methods of protest fail, they can find new ones.

Porn

Sep. 30th, 2023 12:25 pm
paserbyp: (Default)
Sex work is the oldest profession, and that is certainly the case with the internet where online pornography has been equal parts innovation driver and bogeyman. The importance of online erotic content was perhaps never more evident than at the height of the pandemic, when many of us were stuck working and playing from home and staying at least six feet away from, well, everyone. While porn can still be a welcome relief even as the pandemic is waning, consuming it can also put your privacy (or at least your dignity) at risk.

A quick side note: Beyond any personal moral objections to pornography anyone may have, there is also the issue of exploitation. Given how frequently and easily content can be recycled and reposted online, it can be difficult to tell if the people appearing in pornography have consented to have the content released or were fairly compensated. That's not to mention the trafficking in images or videos of child sexual abuse. I don't touch on these issues, but it's important to be aware of them. I encourage everyone to report abuse and exploitation wherever they see it. I don't have the space for it here, but web site Mashable(https://mashable.com) has an excellent deep dive on how to find ethical porn.

Now here's how to enjoy pornography without putting your privacy (or your reputation!) at risk:

1. Go Incognito to Protect Your Privacy While Watching Porn.

One of the easiest ways for your pornographic preferences to become public is the auto-complete self-own. Most browsers and search engines try to be helpful by guessing what you're typing based on what you've done in the past. This can save time, but it can be the source of some embarrassment. If you frequent pornsite.xxx, your browser might "helpfully" fill in that URL when you go to show someone to search for best VPN roundup. This is bad enough if someone is looking over your shoulder, but in these days of working from home and screen sharing in Zoom meetings, you’re likely to multiply your embarrassment by the number of people attending your meeting.

"People who use their devices in public for presentations, demos, school, and work should at least use Incognito mode to make sure porn website addresses don’t get stored," said Bogdan Botezatu, Director of Threat Research and Reporting at Bitdefender. I however, would recommend that any porn partakers use Incognito mode to protect themselves from embarrassment.

While useful, it's worth noting that Incognito mode has limitations. "Your searches, pages you visited, login details, and cookies will not be saved on the device after you close your private windows," explained Daniel Markuson, digital privacy expert at NordVPN.

"However, Incognito mode doesn’t hide traffic from third parties, and it doesn’t secure traffic from hackers or other attacks and vulnerabilities. Your browsing data can still be collected by your ISP, your employer, and any other third party that can track your IP address," said Markuson.

2. Defend Yourself Against Data Theft While Watching Porn.

A more dramatic threat is data theft, which is unfortunately common in all industries. A data breach from an adult website might contain, "private information such as chat conversations, transaction history or even video content preferences," said Botezatu. "This is likely to create a nightmare similar to what happened when Ashley Madison got leaked—people learned about the online whereabouts of spouses, employees, and public persons, causing an unprecedented meltdown." If info from a dating app (albeit one focused on cheating) can cause such a ruckus, imagine how much more sensitive data from porn sites is?

A savvy attacker may not even need to steal your data to profit from it. "Porn watchers might experience some blind blackmailing attempts where they receive messages claiming that hackers have gained access to the computer used for porn-binging and that they also managed to record the victim via the built-in webcam," said Botezatu. "This is a common claim and all similar messages should be immediately deleted."

A variant of this kind of scam is called "sextortion," where the attacker blackmails the victim into providing explicit images of themselves. These can then be used to further pressure the victim. While scammers may be bluffing, it's a good idea to keep your webcam covered when not in use, and to use local antivirus to guard against any snooping software.

In some places, what would be considered legal pornography in the US is outright banned, and accessing it could lead to complications with law enforcement. Even within the US, new age verification laws are making it harder to access pornography. In those situations, a VPN would be a useful tool, but we must stress that we are not advocating breaking any laws and must caution that doing so can have serious consequences.

Mass data collection is big business (in fact, it's pretty much the only big business online, apart from affiliate sales), and incentivizes the collection of enormous amounts of highly detailed personal information. In the US, the list of organizations hungry for your data includes your internet service provider (ISP).

3. Use a VPN to Watch Porn.

The pornography you consume doesn't need to be anyone's business but your own, and in this sense, a VPN is extremely useful. "A VPN reroutes internet traffic through a remote server and hides the IP address, preventing websites from seeing the visitor’s original IP or location," explained Markuson. "A VPN also encrypts traffic exchanged between the internet and your device. This means that nobody, including your ISP, can see what you’re doing online."

A VPN may be more necessary than ever, depending on where you are. Recently passed legislation in Louisiana requires citizens of that state to provide websites with distressingly detailed personal information to access pornographic content. Using a VPN to spoof your location to anywhere else in the US would protect you from having to hand over this information.

A great way to protect your data is to simply never provide it. Privacy services like Abine Blur and others let you create disposable email addresses, phone numbers, and even credit card numbers on the fly. The disposable email addresses are particularly useful since you can generate a new, unique address for each service, making it much harder to tie accounts back to you.

Similarly, disposable credit card numbers are harder to link directly to you and are effectively a one-time-use payment. Additionally, you use Abine's address as the billing address, meaning you'll never have to hand over this sensitive information to a porn site. "They can also facilitate cancellation, which many adult sites make intentionally complicated to retain customers and can be a source of embarrassment for consumers," said Rob Shavell, Co-Founder and CEO of Abine. "Since, really, who wants to explain why you’re disputing a questionable charge from your favorite adult site?"

Websites can track you across the web in a variety of ways, but the method is largely the same: find (or assign) a unique identifier to a visitor, and then wait to see where else that identifier turns up. Tracker blockers break the cycle by preventing ads and sites from IDing you, making it much harder to follow you from site to site. Stand-alone tracker blockers, such as Avast AntiTrack or the EFF's Privacy Badger, are excellent, especially when paired with the privacy tools found in some browsers such as Firefox.

Note that these tools can sometimes break site functionality, particularly custom video players. Privacy Badger, for instance, lets you toggle specific trackers on and off, which can usually fix the issue. Firefox has less flexibility but can likewise be tuned for specific situations.

More than using particular tools, Shavell encourages people to take the time to understand what privacy settings exist in their browsers. "Most have tools to block javascript, pop-ups, and to flush cookies every time you close [your browser]. Basic practices like this go a long way to improving overall browsing safety."

Phishing sites are another avenue of attack. These are malicious websites that prompt you to enter personal information, and then use it for nefarious ends. A common tactic is to disguise a phishing site as a bank login screen, thus tricking victims into parting with their financial login information. A phishing site can also masquerade as a pornographic website, harvesting credit card numbers and personal information for fraud, or contact information for spam. Most web browsers are fairly adept at detecting phishing sites, and antivirus software even more so. If your browser or your security software says that a titillating URL is dangerous, it's best to listen.

4. Why Porn Consumers Need Antivirus.

Even if a pornographic website takes great care to protect its users, it can still become an unwitting vector for attack. "There are some cases where malicious advertisements are bought from small advertising companies and displayed on porn websites," said Botezatu. He explained that this is an issue not just for porn sites, but any place that sells ad space. "Unfortunately, users can’t immediately tell when malicious activity takes place on the respective websites, and this is why a security solution running in the background is highly recommended. "If anything malicious is hosted on the respective page, it will automatically be blocked."

Most people are probably confident in their ability to avoid malicious files and don't see the use of antimalware software. Unfortunately, it's exactly these kinds of people that keep attackers in business. The best security software will identify files and malicious sites before they can cause any damage and can even protect against insidious threats like ransomware.

"When looking for explicit content, users might end up on phishing sites or may click on ads that lead to downloading malware or ransomware," warned Markuson. He advised that users avoid downloading pornographic content, and instead stream it (via a VPN, naturally).

5. Stick to Trusted Porn Names and Sites.

Beyond societal shame, there's a reason why pornographic websites have a spotty reputation. "In the wild-west days of the early internet (late 90s-2000s), there was an explosion of adult sites, many of which were quickly slapped together and were just trying to make a quick buck any way they could," recalled Shavell. "This included implementing outright scams, such as distributing ransomware, viruses, or adware that sent your browser into endless click-generating pop-up cycles."

All the experts we spoke to for this story told some variation of the same tale, concluding that, in general, adult sites are safer now than they used to be. Still, the shady tactics used in the early days of online adult entertainment remain red flags to watch out for. Opening numerous windows or leading you down endless trails of links to access content, for example, is a bad sign.

Many of the experts we spoke with warned against small, "fringe" sites peddling pornographic material. They advised sticking with well-known names in the industry, which are more likely to take care when handling personal information. Things like contact information, a business address, and a privacy policy can be signs that a site is on the up and up.

Shavell also warned against using logins for pornographic sites that might be shared on forums or elsewhere. "These simply tend to be teasers to lure people to the worst sort of scam sites."

Markuson points out that any website could be dangerous, so use the same scrutiny that you would for a pornographic site. "Users should check if the URL of the website begins with HTTPS and has a padlock icon next to it. If it’s just HTTP, the site is not secure."

6. Avoid Risky Behavior.

It's also essential to keep a cool head, even when handling hot content. "Many consumers of pornography exercise poor judgment while browsing because they’re in an excited state. Biology takes over and users overlook risks they’d normally pay attention to," said Shavell. The checkered past of pornographic sites can also set a dangerous expectation that customers should expect some level of shadiness. Shavell recommends being extra cautious and listening to warnings from your computer or browser if it detects something untoward.

Lastly, consider your context. Browsing pornography on a work computer, or while using a work-provided VPN—even if you're quarantined at home—can land you in serious trouble. It's also not a good idea to involve other people in your private fantasies, without their express consent and in an appropriate way. Basically, don't slide into random DMs or be creepy with your colleagues, and be respectful to the sex workers whose content you consume.
paserbyp: (Default)
Biologists in London have traced back the history of masturbation in primates to at least 40 million years ago, according to a new study published Wednesday in Proceedings of the Royal Society B(https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2023.0061).

n an evolutionary sense, the behavior could seem counter-intuitive, writes Darren Incorvaia for Science News—spending time and energy on self-pleasure doesn’t appear to serve a reproductive purpose when compared to mating with another animal. But the new research suggests masturbation may benefit males by boosting reproductive success and helping avoid sexually transmitted infections.

“Historically, masturbation was considered to be either pathological or a byproduct of sexual arousal,” Matilda Brindle, an evolutionary biologist at the University College London, tells Jake Meeus-Jones of the South West News Service (SWNS). “Recorded observations were too fragmented to understand its distribution, evolutionary history or adaptive significance. Perhaps surprisingly, it seems to serve an evolutionary purpose.”

In the study, Brindle and her colleagues describe how they compiled the “largest ever dataset of primate masturbation” from 400 sources, including nearly 250 published papers and 150 responses from primatologists and zookeepers via questionnaires and personal communications, per a statement(https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/991483).

The data suggested that this autosexual behavior most likely occurred in the common ancestor of all monkeys and apes (including humans). But a scarcity of data for other primate groups, like lemurs and tarsiers, makes it unclear whether self-pleasuring behavior was also present in their ancestors, per the statement. Through modeling, the researchers sought to detail when the practice came about.

“This is a very interesting article that sheds light on the evolutionary history of behaviors that leave no trace in the fossil record,” Kit Opie, an anthropologist at the University of Bristol in England, tells New Scientist’s Soumya Sagar.

To find more clues about why masturbation arose, the team used a pair of hypotheses. The first, the “postcopulatory selection hypothesis,” suggests the behavior helps to fertilize an egg. For example, masturbation without ejaculation may increase arousal before sex. This could lead lower-ranking male monkeys to ejaculate faster and therefore have higher breeding success. Masturbation with ejaculation, on the other hand, might allow males to get rid of inferior semen, leading to higher-quality sperm that might outcompete those of other males, reports SWNS.

Another potential explanation—the “pathogen avoidance hypothesis”—suggests that male ejaculation after sex cleanses the urethra, reducing the chance of contracting an STI.

The authors are “the first to use a cross-species approach” to explore the purpose of masturbation, Lateefah Roth, a biologist at the Institute of Forensic Psychiatry and Sex Research at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany, tells Science News, adding that the paper is “a great starting point.”

The researchers found that male masturbation evolved alongside mating systems where competition between males is high. They did not find a similar trend for females—but Brindle tells Science News this may be because of a lack of data rather than this link not existing at all. Research on female sexual behavior has historically been sparse because of past beliefs that females are “passive recipients of male behavior,” she tells the publication.

Brindle says to WION that she finds it “absolutely baffling that nobody has researched such a common behavior across the animal kingdom.”

“For people who think masturbation is wrong, or unnatural in some way, this is perfectly natural behavior,” she tells the publication. “It’s part of our healthy repertoire of sexual behaviors.”

Stealthing

Mar. 16th, 2023 03:36 pm
paserbyp: (Default)
A Dutch court has convicted a man for removing his condom during sex without his partner’s consent, marking a landmark change in how to deal with the act of "stealthing."

"By his actions, the suspect forced the victim to tolerate having unprotected sex with him," the court said. "In doing so, he restricted her personal freedom and abused the trust she had placed in him."

The unnamed 28-year-old man sent the victim texts after they had sex, including one that insisted she would "be fine" after learning of the act, the AFP reported.

"Stealthing" has become a greater issue for courts as they tackle how to best handle cases that can expose a sexual partner to sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy.

The Dutch court in the Dordrecht district acquitted the man of a rape charge, however, because the court ruled that the sex was consensual.

The judge found appropriate "agreement between the suspect and the complainant about the sexual penetration."

The court sentenced the suspect, who is a Syrian-born resident of Rotterdam, to a three-month suspended prison sentence and a 1,000 euro ($1,073) fine for damages.

The case marks the first conviction in the Netherlands for such an offense. Another case involving a 26-year-old suspect saw the defendant acquitted after the court decided it could not determine if the man had intended to force his partner into unprotected sex.

"As soon as sex takes place, and it is not against someone else's will, then there is no coercion," said attorney Mirjam Levy, who represents one of the suspects. "If someone finds out afterward that the conditions have not been met, it does not mean that there is coercion."

Instances of "stealthing" have increased in recent years, leading to the creation of a Dutch website, Stealthing.nl, which is run by a 2017 "stealthing" victim...

The website operator told that "people have already been convicted of rape by stealthing" but that the Netherlands remained less familiar with the act.

Tracking such cases can prove difficult as authorities generally categorize them under rape charges.

In the U.S., California banned "stealthing," requiring verbal consent before removing a condom. But the state has yet to update its criminal code, instead relying on a civil code change so that victims can sue the perpetrator for damages.

Massachusetts State Auditor Diana DiZoglio backed a bill in 2021, when she was a state senator, to ban the act in her state, telling the Boston Globe that it is "an important issue that needs attention from our legislators so we can take a stand with survivors."

A police officer was convicted of sexual assault in a 2018 case in Germany and received an eight-month suspended sentence for "stealthing" and ordered him to pay 3,100 euros ($3,329) in damages.
paserbyp: (Default)
Access to information about safe and effective contraception, like condoms and how to use them, was hidden to many, yet accessible to predominantly white, middle-class men and women. All of this began to change in the 1950s and 1960s, the period when thousands of American women learned, in guarded whispers, about which doctor would provide information about birth control.

Family physicians had reason to be reluctant. In 1873, Congress had passed the Act for the Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of Immoral Use, which was nicknamed the Comstock Act after social reformer Anthony Comstock, who had agitated for its passage. This federal law sparked a series of state laws that further limited access to contraceptives and information about birth control.

But as in every society, people who could have children aggressively sought out contraceptives, laws or no laws. Twentieth-century Americans were no different. In the Smithsonian’s collections, mid-20th century artifacts such as a diaphragm-fitting ring set, dating from between 1930 to 1960, reveal that physicians did assist patients in accessing contraceptives. Similarly, vending machines, which claimed to sell condoms only as disease preventatives, provided people with condoms, which were then used as contraceptives.

The state of Connecticut had some of the nation’s most severe anti-contraception laws, dating back to the late 19th century. Whether married or not, Connecticut citizens caught using contraceptives were subject to at least 60 days in jail, a hefty fine, or both. Physicians and nurses providing contraceptives were deemed accessories to the crime and liable to prison, a fine, or both.

Yet by the 1960s, those in the know had to access to information about contraceptives. They knew which doctor would provide married women with this information and which doctor was prepared to go out on a limb and provide unmarried women with this information. In some areas, doctors provided this information secretly and in other areas, they did so openly. Despite this, the state police regularly turned a blind eye, refusing to enforce the law.

As a result, Connecticut had one of the lowest birth rates in the nation, although many women who didn’t have access to the right information, still struggled to obtain contraception.

Long before the 1960s, physicians, public health advocates and others had repeatedly attempted to challenge Connecticut’s ban on contraception, hoping to overturn the law. But each time, they met with failure. Court decisions veered into the absurd. In 1942, judges on the state’s high court not only upheld the contraceptive ban for married couples, they also advocated “another method, positive and certain in result…[which] is abstinence from intercourse.”

In 1961, Planned Parenthood activists recruited Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton to lead this push. As a “respectable” married woman and a practicing Catholic, Griswold seemed the perfect choice to challenge the law. Buxton was a gynecologist and obstetrician who was also a professor at Yale School of Medicine. Both believed that family planning was central to the stability of the American family; they also recognized that pregnancy could be dangerous for some women.

Griswold’s first attempts to challenge the law met with failure. Although she engaged in illegal activities, including ferrying women across state lines into New York to obtain information about and access to contraceptives, she wasn’t arrested. Similarly, Buxton’s attempts to challenge the law by claiming it infringed upon his ability to practice medicine also failed.

In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to overturn Connecticut’s ban on the basis that the law was not being enforced and was, therefore, a “dead statute.” An irritated Griswold responded by pointing out that the state “couldn’t enforce this law unless they put a policeman under every bed in Connecticut.”

A year later, Griswold grew bolder and more defiant. On November 1, 1961, in her hometown of New Haven, she opened a branch of Planned Parenthood with Buxton serving as its medical director. Within days of the clinic’s opening, police received a complaint that the clinic was “passing out immoral literature and breaking the law.”

Two detectives shutdown the clinic and in late November, Griswold and Buxton arrived in court for their initial hearing. They pled not guilty before a chorus of 20 “well-dressed women of the Planned Parenthood Association [who]…murmured their approval from the back of the court.” The hearing lasted just ten minutes, but Griswold and Buxton’s refusal to plead guilty signaled that the fight was on.

Over the next four years, Griswold and Buxton’s case garnered attention from across the country. Even in West Virginia, a state with no laws banning access to contraception, public health advocates were thrilled by the possibility of Connecticut’s law being overturned. Sending a death knell to these restrictive contraception laws would ensure that public funding for family planning that was targeted to those who could not afford medical care would become less controversial.

In a twist that surprises many people today, support for access to information about birth control was strongest in the American South. Much of this support, unfortunately, was rooted in racist fears of large African American families and the possibility that the region’s white population could become a minority. But the South was also poorer than the North, Midwest and West in the early 1960s, and white southerners may have also supported access to birth control because they recognized that the ability to control the size of their families would help lift them and their children out of poverty.

On June 7, 1965, as Americans across the country waited anxiously to hear the outcome of the case that had begun years before, the court released its decision. Echoing Griswold’s comment about policemen under the bed, Justice William O. Douglas asked, “Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives?”

The answer from the court was a resounding no. In fact, Douglas concluded, the “idea [was] repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship.”

The very public decision of Griswold v. Connecticut was built on previous court cases to argue for an expanded understanding of the “right to privacy.” Douglas argued that the U.S. Constitution allows for several inexplicit rights, all of which flow from other protections explicitly stated in the document.

The right to contraception, the majority opinion argued, was one of these inexplicitly stated rights. The dissenting justices argued that Connecticut’s law was, an “uncommonly silly" one but took umbrage with Douglas and the majority for attacking the law.

In the decades that followed, Griswold v. Connecticut would go on to shape multiple landmark cases, including the 1967 decision in Loving v. Virginia, which forbade bans on interracial marriage; the 1972 decision in Eisenstadt v. Baird, which allowed individuals, regardless of their marital status, access to contraceptives; and the 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. But the most famous case to stem from the Griswold v. Connecticut case was the 1973 case Roe v. Wade, which drew on the idea of the right to privacy to enable a pregnant woman the right to seek and obtain an abortion.

Today, as Americans face the loss of reproductive rights—everything from access to contraceptives to the right to obtain an abortion—it’s instructive to know that in 1965, the decision to overturn Connecticut’s ban on access to contraception won accolades across multiple circles, including the Catholic Church. Monsignor John C. Knott, director of the National Catholic Welfare Council, praised the ruling, saying that the Catholic Church did “not seek the power of the state to compel compliance with its moral views.” And in Connecticut’s capital city of Hartford, Archbishop Henry J. O’Brien hailed the legal interpretation behind the court’s decision.

Griswold v. Connecticut leveled the playing field by ensuring that married women of all classes and races had access to information about contraception, regardless of where they lived. For years after Griswold v. Connecticut—and the later cases including Roe v .Wade—few opposed the court’s decisions in establishing a “right to privacy.” Many Americans endorsed Justice Douglas’ landmark 1965 decision that had assured them that planning when and how many children they would have as “fundamental constitutional guarantees.”

Next month Griswold v. Connecticut celebrates its 57th anniversary. Although forgotten by many Americans, the ruling has come into the spotlight again in discussions about Roe v. Wade.

History does not always give us guideposts to the future but rolling back the idea of the right to privacy enshrined in Griswold v .Connecticut would turn back a clock. Middle- and upper-class men and women would still manage to access birth control, so will people who work in the halls of the Supreme Court or Congress. Those outside this circle would be vulnerable to unwanted pregnancies.

Anal

Mar. 4th, 2022 08:13 pm
paserbyp: (Default)
The United States Food and Drug Administration has authorized the use of ONE Condoms during anal intercourse to reduce sexually transmitted infections. This is the first time the agency has approved a condom specifically for use during anal sex.

“The risk of STI transmission during anal intercourse is significantly higher than during vaginal intercourse,” says Courtney Lias, director of the FDA’s office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices in a statement. “The FDA’s authorization of a condom that is specifically indicated, evaluated and labeled for anal intercourse may improve the likelihood of condom use during anal intercourse.”

Condoms need to have less than a five percent failure rate for authorization, and earlier studies have shown higher failure rates, writes the New York Times’ Pam Belluck.

A clinical trial in 2019 tested the effectiveness of ONE condoms, manufactured by Global Protection Corporation, in 252 men who have sex with men and 252 men who have sex with women. ONE condoms have previously been approved for use during vaginal sex. Condom failure was defined as slippage or breakage, per the study, which found a 0.68 percent total failure rate for anal intercourse and 1.89 percent failure rate for vaginal intercourse.

The gap in effectiveness may have been because of differences in lubricant use. Lubricant was used for 98 percent of anal sex during the study, while it was only used for about 42 percent of vaginal sex acts. The study instructed men having sex with men to always use lubricant, while men having sex with women were instructed to use lubricant as needed or preferred. A secondary analysis using data only from participants that used lubricant showed similar failure rates for both anal and vaginal sex, per the study.

“There have been over 300 condoms approved for use with vaginal sex data, and never before has a condom been approved based on anal sex data,” says Dr. Aaron Siegler, lead author of the clinical trial, in a statement. “This is despite two-thirds of HIV transmission in the United States being linked to anal sex. Having condoms tested and approved for anal sex will allow users to have confidence in using condoms to prevent HIV transmission.”

A previous study led by Siegler found that 69 percent of men who have sex with other men were likely to use a condom more often if it indicated FDA approval on the label.

Despite a lack of authorization, people have long used condoms for anal sex; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention even recommends it, per the Agence France Presse. However, condom companies were only allowed to market their products as safe and effective for vaginal sex.

“It’s a great thing if the package inserts could indicate anal sex because it might create an incentive for the companies to do more marketing,” Dr. Kenneth Mayer, the medical research director for Fenway Health, who was not involved in the study, tells the Times. “You don’t see condom ads on gay social media, for example, so this would incentivize that as part of the conversation.”

Dr. Will DeWitt, clinical director of anal health at the Callen-Lorde Community Health Center in New York City, tells NBC News the FDA approval is long overdue.

“Here we are in 2022, and we are only now getting condoms approved for anal sex,” DeWitt tells the outlet. “It’s a little frustrating that it’s taken this long to have this kind of official endorsement.”

Sex Robots

May. 7th, 2018 09:47 am
paserbyp: (Default)


It started last month, when a Toronto man intentionally drove his van into a crowd. His ideology? The incel movement — a politically radicalized form of misogyny in which “involuntarily celibate” men envision taking vengeance on the virile “Chads” and shallow “Stacys” they believe are contributing to their sexual poverty. (It’s the same movement, fomented on internet discussion forums like Reddit and 4chan, that inspired the 2014 Santa Barbara shooter, venerated in incel circles as the “Supreme Gentleman”). How, various media outlets wondered, could we combat such a radical, toxic ideology, one that had already racked up a high body count?

Out of this reaction came a modest proposal. George Mason University economist Robin Hanson published a blog post seemingly advocating for “sexual redistribution”: a subversion of the sexual marketplace in which sexual access was state-sanctioned and state-organized. The government, in other words, should intervene to provide incels with sex. “One might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met,” he wrote.

It’s not the first time the image of the sex robot has entered mainstream public discourse. Now, as in the 19th century — the heyday of what we might call a “sex robot panic” — the image of the sex robot is a cultural specter of the way an increasingly capitalist, increasingly technologically advanced society tends to commodify human beings. The idea that “incels” might (or should) seek companionship from sex dolls is not a new one in incel discourse, particularly as sex robot technology gets increasingly advanced and sex dolls more lifelike. But it hit the mainstream on May 2 when New York Times columnist Ross Douthat published a controversial column called “The Redistribution of Sex.” The article concluded that “the logic of commerce and technology will be consciously harnessed, as already in pornography, to address the unhappiness of incel.” Douthat wrote that “the left’s increasing zeal to transform prostitution into legalized and regulated ‘sex work’” combined with “the libertarian (and general male) fascination with virtual-reality porn and sex robots” will lead to people agreeing that there is a right to sexual access. Douthat’s column has since pushed sex robots to the forefront of the conversation. The contrarian conservative UK magazine the Spectator, for example, published a piece directly advocating for sex robots for incels.

Sex dolls (or sex statues, or sex robots) have been around, as a trope, for millennia. The idea of a man falling in love with, and copulating with, a created woman dates back at least to Pygmalion’s Galatea, a narrative reproduced in the ancient Roman-era Metamorphoses by Ovid and elsewhere. European sailors in the 17th century made their dame du voyage: masturbatory aids for long naval journeys. But the origins of the sex robot as a cultural phenomenon date back more recently, to 19th-century Paris. Paris in the 19th century was a chaotic place. Described by philosopher Walter Benjamin as the “capital of the 19th century,” Paris was a place of intense cultural change. The old city — a city of medieval alleyways and labyrinthine streets — was, from 1853 onward, gradually being bulldozed under Emperor Napoleon III’s chief architect Georges-Eugène Haussmann. This gave way to a city of wide boulevards, electric gas lights, and (a new invention), department store shopping. Newly industrialized, with a burgeoning middle class who could, for the first time, afford the mass-produced luxury goods technology had made possible, Paris was also, for many, a source of existential anxiety. “Old Paris is no more,” lamented the poet Charles Baudelaire, “the form of a city changes more quickly, alas! than the human heart.”

Culturally, too, things were in flux. Increasingly secular, Paris’s cultural milieu was dominated by “positivists” like the writer Émile Zola and scientists like Jean-Marie Charcot, who believed not just in the supremacy of scientific progress, but also in the idea that human beings were fundamentally explicable. They believed that by, metaphorically speaking, taking them apart and analyzing them, you could understand everything about them. (In The Experimental Novel, Zola described his novelistic technique as being like a doctor at an operating table.)

Meanwhile, a reactionary right embraced radical forms of nostalgia: from an aesthetic obsession with the medieval era to deeply conservative Catholicism to misogynist occultism.

It was in this heady atmosphere of competing and contradictory cultural influences that the sex robot became a popular recurring trope. Some of our first references are in the diaries of the novelists and social chronicles the Goncourt brothers. In May 1858, they reported going to a brothel where they heard a rumor about another brothel whose robots were indistinguishable from their humans.

These rumors remained in the seedy underbelly of Paris’s sex trade until 1884, when the eccentric novelist and dandy Louis-Auguste Villiers de L’Isle-Adam, published his book L’Éve Future.

That Eve of the Future was not a flesh-and-blood woman but a robot (Villiers was the first to use the term Andreïde, or “android,” in fiction). Created by a not exactly fictionalized Thomas Edison as a replacement for the boring lover of his impassioned friend, Lord Ewald (it’s a very weird book), “Hadaly” is presented by Edison as an example of the triumph of the false, man-made, and scientific over the merely biological.

Throughout the novel, it becomes clear that Villiers, a reactionary ultra-Catholic monarchist, is using L’Éve Future not to praise but to critique this mentality. Villiers uses the robot woman not just as a misogynist device — fake women are “better” than real women — but as a critique of a culture that treats everything, even people, as commodities.

Robot women and doll characters abound in late-19th and early-20th-century media. There’s the living doll Olympia in the 1881 opera The Tales of Hoffmann. There’s the unnerving real-life case of poet Oskar Kokoschka, who — after his beloved Alma Mahler left him in 1918 — had a sex doll made that resembled her. There’s the false Maria, a robot designed in part to stave off a communist uprising, in Fritz Lang’s 1927 German expressionist film Metropolis.

In each of these fictional cases, the image of the robot woman or sex doll was used to explore wider ideas about the uncomfortable ways that capitalism, dehumanization, and sexual desire intersect. Later robot women stories have also tended to come during similar resurgences of the capitalist aesthetic, like Ira Levin’s 1975 novel The Stepford Wives.

“Sex robots,” therefore, have always been about more than sex. They’ve been a cultural repository for wider uncertainties in times of social change: a literalization of the fear that all human beings are fundamentally replaceable. They represent everything we most fear about what Walter Benjamin, writing about that era in Parisian history, called the “commodity-soul.”

Bottom line is as Douthat and Hanson alike predict sex robots as an inevitable part of our future, incels are bringing a different kind of sex robot into discourse. The word “femoid” has become the preferred incel term for (human) women, on the grounds that all women are basically robots anyway.

Meanwhile, some of the Goncourt brothers’ 150-year-old anxieties are coming true. A sex doll brothel has, in fact, just opened in Paris.
paserbyp: (Default)



The truth is that the hippie "movement" was, and remains. the most enigmatic, inexplicable, ambiguous, and intoxicating societal upheaval in modern American history. Like the Paris Commune, The European revolution of 1848, and the California gold rush of the following year, it is what the French writer Yves Fremion called an "orgasm of history": a sudden eruption of something completelly unprecedented, unclassifiable, and transformative. And because the eye of this weird hurricane was in San Francisco, this city has become a shrine(or mausoleum) to it.

The Summer of Love was infinitely complex. It had a bright, hopeful, even heroic side, but also a dark and tragic one. Some of the young people who flocked to the Haight 50 yesrs ago found not paradise but a psychic or physical nightmare. A lot of had shit went down. The final scene in John Didion's classic piece of reportage "Slouching Towards Bethlehem" features a five-year-old girl whose mother has been giving her LSD. The Summer of Love was the season of the '60s when heroin and violent crime began to replace grass, acid, and gauzy talk about love. It is foolish to sentimentalize it.

But it is equally shortsighted to demonize it, or deny its transformative effects. For a brief time, half a century ago, San Francisco was the center of the strangest cultural revolution America has ever seen. We are still sorting out its meaning and its consequences.
paserbyp: (Default)




A resent survey of software developers and their habits was released last month by Stack Overflow (https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2017).

The report found that 74% of the 64.000 developers who responded from 213 countries - identify as web developers. The next most common were desktop application developers (29%) and mobile application developers (23%).

Diversity among software developers is up, with women representing 10% of the developer workforce in the USA, up from 6% last year. Women were less like to be DevOps or systems administrators, and more likely to be data and graphic designers. One side note: more women than men reported they have been coding less than 1 year. Interestingly, 2.6% of respondents chose something other man or woman when asked to check of their gender.

A big focus of the survey was to see how software developers go about finding jobs. 27% said someone they knew contacted them about a position, and 18% said they were reached out to by someone at a company. Another 13% said they went through a headhunter to find a position.

What do software developers find most important in a job? Ongoing learning and the opportunity for professional growth and that even beat compensation. Another important factor for software developers was the ability to work remotely. Some 53% of those who work remotely reported a higher job satisfaction than those who were in an office.

How much do software developers love their work? 75% of software developers said they write code as a hobby. Can you imagine finance guys getting from work and then doing finance as a hobby?

Profile

paserbyp: (Default)
paserbyp

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
456 78910
11 1213 14 151617
18 19 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated May. 21st, 2025 02:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »